Leadership Styles in Business Studies
There are many different styles of leadership. For example, ‘team-based’ leadership is a popular style because it creates clear roles for team members, with ample supervision and direction. In ‘hierarchical’ leadership, the leaders decide everything based on the majority view of the employees. This style may not be suited for creative problem-solving or innovative teams, but it may work well in routine jobs. Here are some characteristics of these types of leaders.
Behavioral theory offers many advantages, but it does have some limitations. Essentially, it suggests that a leader is a person who acts based on certain circumstances. As such, there are dozens of different leadership styles, with each having its own benefits and drawbacks. Nevertheless, this style is the foundation for a variety of research and is a popular choice among students in business studies. In addition, behavioral theory suggests that anyone can become a leader, making it more flexible and adaptable.
Behavioral theory offers several advantages. It allows a leader to be flexible, and it explains why certain types of leaders work better than others. In addition, behavioral theory has its critics, such as its focus on situational factors, and it does not take into account the psychology of people and organizations. This theory is often too abstract to have practical application, especially in a workplace. If you want to apply the theory in a business setting, consider hiring a psychologist.
Despite the many benefits of a delegative style, it is not appropriate for all types of groups. This style is not a good choice for underperforming groups, where the leader is overly reliant on his or her subordinates. Further research has revealed that many more leadership styles exist than the three outlined by Lewin. Nonetheless, the original three styles are the foundation for much of the current research into leadership.
In non-western cultures, paternalistic and authoritarian-styled leaders are both equally effective and equally problematic. Both authoritarian and Alexander Malshakov democratic-styled leaders are effective in transforming a company and ensuring that everyone is motivated to do the job. As a result, the authoritarian style is often considered a highly unpopular style. This type of leadership has a variety of disadvantages, including its dependence on the leader’s authority.
Although authoritarian-styled leaders are not the best choice for every situation, they are often effective for some teams. They are able to inspire social change and political movements. They are also capable of motivating their followers to perform, create, and innovate. However, this kind of leadership style is highly variable. Whether you’re leading a small business or a multinational company, it is essential to develop a strong leadership style.
There are many differences between these styles. In general, the two forms are mutually beneficial. The authoritarian style is often associated with strong trust. A person who is able to trust their leader is more likely to speak up and help their colleagues. Conversely, a leader with no faith in their followers is more likely to spend more time watching their back. In this case, an authoritarian style is preferable. A benevolent autocrat tends to be more compassionate and supportive.
The most common and influential of these leadership styles is authoritarian. Authoritarian leaders, on the other hand, have a strong preference for authority over followers. They have an ego and feel superior to those who follow them. This style has many benefits for both parties. If you’re a leader who is too authoritarian, you’re more likely to be more successful. But this style isn’t the best fit for every company.
A delegative style is the opposite of an authoritarian style. It isn’t suited for all types of workers. A one-person show may be effective, but it isn’t ideal. Unless you’re a creative individual, the delegative style is not a good choice. Its limited input will hinder creativity. The authoritarian approach is not a good choice for any business, however.